Our View: Time for foes to sit down and talk (January 15, 2017)
The Town of Apple Valley and Liberty Utilities have been at odds ever since Liberty acquired Apple Valley Ranchos Water Company from its previous owner, Park Water Co., about a year ago.
And of course before that the town and Park found themselves similarly at odds.
At odds actually doesn’t do justice to the bitterness of this conflict. The Town Council wants to take over Liberty Utilities through eminent domain and make the water system the property of the town. Liberty Utilities, part of Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp., a public company based in Oakville, Ontario, Canada, is fighting the takeover attempt for all it is worth, as one would expect.
The reason for the conflict is simple: water rates. The Town Council and many of Liberty’s customers believe they are too high and have been increasing too much and too rapidly. They can point to doubledigit increases for several years, making water rates in Apple Valley significantly higher than those in neighboring Hesperia or Victorville.
The Town Council isn’t promising Liberty customers that rates will decline if it successfully takes over the company, but believes that rates could be stabilized quickly. That is music to the ears of many customers.
However, there is an element of risk in the Town Council’s plan. Recently, a judge declined to allow the city of Claremont to take over Golden State Water Company’s Claremont assets, a ruling that will cost the city millions of dollars. It should be noted that the same attorney who represented Golden State in that case is working for Liberty, and the same legal firm that represented Claremont — Best, Best and Krieger — is representing the Town of Apple Valley.
So the question is, should the town continue down this all-or-nothing path to potential Liberty takeover, a path that will require a vote of residents to continue, or would it be prudent to engage Liberty in negotiations now?
Liberty recently asked the California Public Utilities Commission for — and was granted — a two-year rate freeze. So water rates in Apple Valley will remain unchanged for two years.
Could the town convince Liberty to extend that freeze for 10, 15 or 20 more years in exchange for ending its takeover bid? Could the town also convince Liberty to reduce the bimonthly service charge for a ¾-inch meter (which is higher than currently charged in both Hesperia and Victorville) in exchange for ending its takeover bid?
As it stands, attorneys are primarily profiting from this water war between Liberty and the town. We think it would make sense for both sides to come to the table to see if common ground might be found.
Our sense is that Apple Valley customers of Liberty Utilities mainly are concerned about unfettered rate increases. If a deal could be reached that stabilized or even reduced rates for a significant period of time, we would expect customers to be very happy.
We encourage Liberty and the Town of Apple Valley to come together. After all, it doesn’t cost anything to talk.
Source: Daily Press
Files related to Claremont
- 20150308 Acquiring AVRWC is right move for Apple Valley
- 20150314 Expense of possible AVRWC acquisition difficult to gauge
- 20150514 Claremont Water System — Supplement to 2012 Appraisal Report
- 20150905 Letter: Lawyers, water, and money (O’Neil)
- 20150918 TOAV fires back at Coupal
- 20150923 Editorial: Water, takeovers, and the people
- 20151015 Cities and private equity firms fight over ownership of water systems
- 20160712 Public records request (Manning)
- 20160721 Conflict of interest (Manning)
- 20160904 Letter: Peter Allen supporting Measure V (Nassif)
- 20161012 Claremont Set To Raise Rates For Utilities
- 20161018 Will Apple Valley become California’s Flint, MI?
- 20161110 Statement of tentative decision (Claremont v. Golden State Water)
- 20161110 Judge issues tentative decision against city in water system acquisition trial (Claremont v. Golden State Water)
- 20161114 Measures V and W
- 20161115 Polls and votes
- 20161116 Another false narrative
- 20161116 Liberty sees Claremont’s eminent-domain loss as sign of things to come in Apple Valley
- 20161121 Voters show they want a say in water takeover issue (Hanson)
- 20161215 Another costly day for Apple Valley
- 20161218 Time to pay attention: An open letter to Larry Cusack
- 20170111 Claremont city manager getting a $21,000 bonus
- 20170114 Price tag for Claremont’s failed attempt to take over water system keeps rising
- 20170115 Our View: Time for foes to sit down and talk
- Time for the Town Council to listen for a change
- Response to Thomas Lecoq (Carloni)
- Time for a second opinion? (Carloni)
- 20170209 Avoiding the Claremont disaster (video)
- 20170213 Valley Voices: Apple Valley would be wise to work with Liberty Utilities (Wright)
- 20170216 James Belna on the Claremont eminent domain disaster (video)
- 20170220 Claremont resident talks [about] avoiding ‘disaster’ in Apple Valley
- 20170220 Conflict of interest
- 20170220 Letter: Response to Thomas Rice (Belna)
- 20170226 Letter: James Belna’s visit (Hanson)
- 20170226 Letter: Rice rebuttal (Trozpek)
- Claremont public records request
- Truth not tricks (Carloni)
- Comments to the Town Council opposing the ballot measure
- 20170314 Town Council meeting (McCarthy)
- 20170322 Skewing the facts (Hanson)
- 20170323 Letter: Sit down and settle (Henard)
- 20170406 Guest commentary: Government takeovers of water systems don’t deliver results — study
- Who pays?
- Responding to claims made on Facebook
- 20170508 Liberty Utilities radio ad — Claremont (audio)
- Not paying attention
- 20171010 Claremont reaches $4.8 million settlement agreement with Golden State Water
- 20171017 Claremont settlement reignites Apple Valley water war
- 20171026 Claremont cuts ties with its city attorney, law firm