Claremont Set To Raise Rates For Utilities (October 12, 2016)
Claremont — The City Council Wednesday night took the first step toward raising water rates an estimated 15 percent increase over five years for the average user.
The ordinance, approved 8-0, still requires a second reading and a public hearing before another council vote for adoption.
The council asked that when the public hearing is held, the Department of Public Works present its proposal using a Power Point and further, councilors want the impact shown in an example of a water and sewer bill for the average customer.
Councilor Scott Pope, who strongly opposed the DPW’s first recommendation that would have increased the average water and sewer bill nearly 33 percent, or $218, over the next five years, seemed satisfied with the rate increase approved by the council.
In particular, he cited the proposed rate freeze for five years for customers who use 2,000 cubic feet of water or less. Pope said it is important to keep those current rates in place because it is probably the category where many elderly and young people fall into.
It will help a lot of people, Pope said.
The average use equals 2,500 cubic feet every six months.
If approved as is, the average semi-annual water and sewer bill would increase about $100 over five years, according to the presentation Wednesday night.
Assistant Public Works Director Vic St. Pierre, who prepared several different options for the council, said the staff recommended the plan that was approved because its impact on the water department’s cash balance is not severe and they will be able to complete some capital improvement projects.
The water cash reserves would drop and estimated $400,000 over five years, bringing them from $2.5 million to $2.1 million with the sewer balance decreasing from $4.5 million to $3.8 million over the same period.
St. Pierre also noted that since 1988, water use in the city, from a combination of conservation and loss of industry, has dropped 40 percent, but cost to run and repair the system keep going up.
If I had growth in the water system, we wouldn’t be asking for an increase, St. Pierre said.
He further told the council that even with the increase, Claremont’s rates still would be below a number of surrounding and similar size communities.
Mayor Charlene Lovett was not at the meeting, but Assistant Mayor Vic Bergeron read a statement from her in which she favored an increase over the next year to cover operating costs and any debt payments.
St. Pierre said the recommended increase would allow for some, but not all, projects in the water department’s capital improvement plan to be completed, including the continued replacement of meters with lead in them.
Councilor Bruce Temple, the city’s former public works director, and City Manager Guy Santagate both expressed concerns that the council was not raising rates enough for much needed capital improvements.
It is less of an issue to vote a lower rate, said Santagate.
You are not going to do the projects that are necessary. There is no other way around it.
Temple said all the projects could get done if
you fully fund the rate increase
and not kick the can down the road.
The original recommendation for a 33 percent increase over five years would have meant money for capital projects and increasing the cash balance of the department.
Source: Patrick O’Grady, Valley News
Files related to Claremont
- 20150308 Acquiring AVRWC is right move for Apple Valley
- 20150314 Expense of possible AVRWC acquisition difficult to gauge
- 20150514 Claremont Water System — Supplement to 2012 Appraisal Report
- 20150905 Letter: Lawyers, water, and money (O’Neil)
- 20150918 TOAV fires back at Coupal
- 20150923 Editorial: Water, takeovers, and the people
- 20151015 Cities and private equity firms fight over ownership of water systems
- 20160712 Public records request (Manning)
- 20160721 Conflict of interest (Manning)
- 20160904 Letter: Peter Allen supporting Measure V (Nassif)
- 20161012 Claremont Set To Raise Rates For Utilities
- 20161018 Will Apple Valley become California’s Flint, MI?
- 20161110 Statement of tentative decision (Claremont v. Golden State Water)
- 20161110 Judge issues tentative decision against city in water system acquisition trial (Claremont v. Golden State Water)
- 20161114 Measures V and W
- 20161115 Polls and votes
- 20161116 Another false narrative
- 20161116 Liberty sees Claremont’s eminent-domain loss as sign of things to come in Apple Valley
- 20161121 Voters show they want a say in water takeover issue (Hanson)
- 20161215 Another costly day for Apple Valley
- 20161218 Time to pay attention: An open letter to Larry Cusack
- 20170111 Claremont city manager getting a $21,000 bonus
- 20170114 Price tag for Claremont’s failed attempt to take over water system keeps rising
- 20170115 Our View: Time for foes to sit down and talk
- Time for the Town Council to listen for a change
- Response to Thomas Lecoq (Carloni)
- Time for a second opinion? (Carloni)
- 20170209 Avoiding the Claremont disaster (video)
- 20170213 Valley Voices: Apple Valley would be wise to work with Liberty Utilities (Wright)
- 20170216 James Belna on the Claremont eminent domain disaster (video)
- 20170220 Claremont resident talks [about] avoiding ‘disaster’ in Apple Valley
- 20170220 Conflict of interest
- 20170220 Letter: Response to Thomas Rice (Belna)
- 20170226 Letter: James Belna’s visit (Hanson)
- 20170226 Letter: Rice rebuttal (Trozpek)
- Claremont public records request
- Truth not tricks (Carloni)
- Comments to the Town Council opposing the ballot measure
- 20170314 Town Council meeting (McCarthy)
- 20170322 Skewing the facts (Hanson)
- 20170323 Letter: Sit down and settle (Henard)
- 20170406 Guest commentary: Government takeovers of water systems don’t deliver results — study
- Who pays?
- Responding to claims made on Facebook
- 20170508 Liberty Utilities radio ad — Claremont (audio)
- Not paying attention
- 20171010 Claremont reaches $4.8 million settlement agreement with Golden State Water
- 20171017 Claremont settlement reignites Apple Valley water war
- 20171026 Claremont cuts ties with its city attorney, law firm