Town business practices (September 6, 2016)
Mayor Pro Tem Scott Nassif covered a lot of ground in his recent letter to the editor (
Peter Allen might have had a moment of enlightenment about the way the Town charges for sewer services after reading the text of the
Proposition 218 lawsuit that was filed against the Town (
As for the valuation of Liberty Utilities’ Apple Valley water system, the Town presentations have been unsatisfactory at best, bordering on incompetent and fraudulent. There’s no other way to describe the Town valuing the water system at $45 million (or later, $54 million) when Liberty Utilities has $68 million in water rights alone, on top of the 20,000 connections, 465 miles of water mains, 25 wells, emergency generators, storage tanks, booster stations, and pressure zones. Add to that an office, maintenance and installation equipment (including trucks and heavy machinery), inventory, and other assets. Even if these additional assets were worth only the same amount as the water rights, that still puts the valuation of Ranchos close to $150 million, $100 million more than the town says is the fair market value for Ranchos.
In Missoula, the court accepted the city’s argument that the water system needed $95 million in immediate repairs and upgrades, which brings the actual price to around $183 million. Liberty Utilities’ system is in better shape, but you can add at least $8 million per year that this drags on in repairs and upgrades because that’s what Liberty Utilities is prohibited from spending since the Town stepped in. Even Nassif himself implied that Liberty Utilities could be worth more than $100 million (
While we’re still on the subject of valuation, Nassif says he doesn’t know where Mr. Allan
came up the $120 million price tag for the purchase of Liberty Utilities. Well, in 2011, the Town’s Blue Ribbon Water Committee took eight months to determine that the value of Ranchos was $121,000,000, but that the Town should forgo purchasing it because the final purchase price might go as high as $200,000,000. This Report was completed December 2011 and presented to the Town Council (Nassif included) on January 2012. This isn’t the first time Nassif has questioned where opponents have gotten their information, even though the source was the Town itself.
As for water rates in Apple Valley, they are comparable to those in surrounding communities once you account for all the hidden ups and extras there always are in municipal water systems (
Move to Apple Valley, and if there is a private company you don’t like (besides those owned and operated by the Town Councilmembers), we’ll seize it. By the way, there are lots of reasons homes aren’t selling in Apple Valley, including the impact of other poor decisions by the Town Council.
Neither the lawsuit nor the facts matter, though, because Scott Nassif wants this, and he has assembled the financial wizard of Flint, MI, and the legal wizards from Bell, CA, to get it done. Meanwhile, even though the Town pays $10 million annually in employee costs it cannot maintain what it already has.
Measure V is important because it represents the last chance for true local control by the residents of Apple Valley until we can vote out the current council.
— Greg Raven is Co-Chair of Apple Valley Citizens for Government Accountability, and is concerned about quality of life issues.
Published: Daily Press, September 8, 2016
Files related to Measure V
- 20150913 Commentary: Apple Valley water takeover plan: Know the full cost (Coupal)
- 20160621 Measure V
- 20160726 TOAV staff report on Measure V
- 20160831 Best supporters money can buy
- 20160831 Serious omission
- 20160831 Town paid more than $50K for ballot measure
- 20160904 Letter: Peter Allen supporting Measure V (Nassif)
- 20160906 Town business practices
- 20160908 Letter: Don’t waste your vote (Carloni)
- 20160911 Letter: Measure Waste (Carloni)
- 20160918 Our View: The right to vote on big projects
- 20160919 Support Measure V
- 20160923 Opinion: Measure V is for voting to ensure government is accountable (Mann)
- 20160924 Letter: Measure W (Piercy)
- 20160925 Opinion: Measure V respects Liberty Utilities customers’ rights (Sorensen)
- 20160929 Letter: Time to go (Varga)
- 20161002 Letter: Reject Measure W (Allan)
- 20161010 Letter: Truth about V and W (Bell)
- 20161011 Letter: The measure of a man (Varga)
- 20161018 Will Apple Valley become California’s Flint, MI?
- 20161020 Yes on Measure V (video)
- 20161023 Letter: Supports Measure V (Schappert)
- 20161025 Diving into the shallow waters of Measure W
- 20161102 Letter: Measure of a man (McCarthy)
- 20161102 No water in Measure W
- 20161103 More Measure W misdirection
- 20161103 No on W, Yes on V
- 20161105 Money flows like water
- 20161111 Letter: Diving into shallow ‘W’ater
- 20161111 Measure V garnered 2,319 more yes votes than Measure W
- 20161113 Tuesday’s election results
- 20161114 Measures V and W
- 20161115 Polls and votes
- 20161121 Voters show they want a say in water takeover issue (Hanson)