TOAV’s attempt at transparency is sorely lacking (September 24, 2015)
In August, the Town of Apple Valley released its inaugural
Transparency Report to inform the public about the money it has spent and is planning to spend on efforts to acquire Apple Valley Ranchos Water Company. I count myself among the Apple Valley residents who appreciate the gesture, but question why the Town’s feet had to be held to the fire before they agreed to public disclosure, and why the
Transparency Report had so many errors, omissions, and irrelevant information.
Here are a few of the questions about the Town’s $3.2 million takeover budget that remain unanswered, and remain a real stumbling block to legitimate transparency.
First, where did this $3.2 million come from? For a Town that has seen a recent uptick in crime, it is important to know what is not being paid due to the Town’s attempt at acquiring a private water company. Considering the poor maintenance of our storm drains ahead of what is promised to be an El Nino rain year, residents need to know the specifics.
Second, why are costs for the takeover spread out over several different departments, instead of rating their own line item within the City Manager’s department? The fact that $3.2 million are figuratively being
scrounged gives the appearance that acquisition costs are purposely being hidden, especially when there isn’t a single line item in the adopted budget for 2015-2016 that refers to acquisition efforts.
Third, we were told initially that starting in August the Town would publish a
Transparency Report monthly, but by September residents were left on their own to discover that instead it is going to be issued quarterly. How are residents supposed to monitor this process with a quarterly report schedule?
In April of this year, the auditor and treasurer of the State of Ohio pitched a plan to put the checkbooks of cities, counties, villages, townships, and schools online to restore Ohioans’ faith in government. The City of Victorville recently made news when it contracted with OpenGov to share documents with the public. This substantive action was made all the more admirable by how little fanfare surrounded the announcement.
The City of Victorville is reported to have spent $8,000 to have its new OpenGov system go live. If the Town of Apple Valley invested in a system that didn’t fall prey to decisions over which documents were posted and which were not, it could save hundreds of thousands of dollars of staff and attorney time on public records requests, based on the August
As it is, all the Town’s official documents related to a proposed acquisition, from Environmental Impact Report to other official notices, are hosted on the Town’s propaganda website, instead of its official website. This arrangement gives rise to reservations about the sincerity of the Town’s
transparency efforts, as these — and only these — public records are bathed in political spin crafted by expensive PR consultants.
All we’re asking is that the Town of Apple Valley provides some straight answers to those of us who question the wisdom of spending hundreds of millions of dollars acquiring Apple Valley Ranchos Water Company.
— Greg Raven is Co-Chair of Apple Valley Citizens for Government Accountability, and is concerned about quality of life issues.
Published: Daily Press
Files related to the the Town’s “transparency”
- 20100913 Transparency — Ethics — Accountable (Stanton)
- 20150526 TOAV lacks transparency (Lee)
- Transparency is job No. 1
- 20150811 Ranchos Acquisition Efforts Transparency Report
- 20150914 Letter: Transparency or racket? (Harbottle)
- A critical examination of the TOAV’s ‘Transparency Report‘
- TOAV ‘transparency’: One and done, or more to come?
- TOAV’s attempt at transparency is sorely lacking
- Wrong focus
- Comparative transparency
- 20160126 Ranchos Acquisition Efforts Transparency Report
- Comparing transparency
- The future of transparency
- 20160831 Ranchos Acquisition Efforts Transparency Report
- 20160913 Ranchos Acquisition Efforts Transparency Report
- 20160915 Apple Valley’s water transparency report reveals price tag at $1.5 million
- Some ‘transparency’
- Public records request: Transparency reports
- Public records request: Acquisition-related documents
- 20190725 TOAV PRR response 1
- 20190725 TOAV PRR response 2
- 20190726 TOAV PRR extension
- Following up on unanswered public records requests
- The numbers don’t add up
- 20190812 TOAV response to public records request 2019-292: No records related to acquisition expenses
- Public records request 2019-292: Attorney demand letter
- 20190820 TOAV PRR 2019-292: Acknowledgement of demand letter
- 20190830 TOAV partial response to public records request 2019-292
- Transparency, Apple Valley style